MONDAY
JANUARY 26
2004

ShopNetDaily

Page 1
News

Page 2
News

G2
Bulletin

BizNetDaily

LocalNetDaily

Commentary

Classified
Ads

Letters

People
Search

SportsNetDaily

Health

Weather

TV
Guide

MusicNetDaily

Movies

Stocks

Mel Gibson's 'Passion'

Posted: January 26, 2004
1:00 a.m.
Eastern

© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com

Mel Gibson is the bravest man in Hollywood. Perhaps, he's the bravest
in the country, all because of a movie. It's called "The Passion of The
Christ" and it opens on Ash Wednesday, Feb. 25.

His isn't just the courage of a man facing physical danger in a job or
in a lifestyle. Gibson endures that and more – much, much more.

He's under fire for his life and beliefs, his morality and for his
religion. It's not often, in this day and age, that anyone faces
that kind of challenge. When it happens, it's often a private hell.
Gibson's hell has been very public.

Mel Gibson wanted to produce a film about the Passion of Christ – the
last 12 hours of His life, up to and including the Crucifixion. He says
it's a film he had to make and he spent $25 million of his own
money to do it. When he approached studios for financing or distribution,
they scurried away like rats.

Gibson wanted to use the Gospels as the basic script. He wanted it in
Aramaic, the language of the time. He wanted it as the Bible presents it,
without sanitizing the horror of the suffering and death. He certainly
wanted it without the usual Hollywood touch of sex and heresy. It was to
be as close as possible to portraying what actually happened. He did it.

Gibson risked everything, knowing that if he lost the gamble, he'd not
only face the financial ruin, but in the eyes of Hollywood, he'd be done –
a failure and a fool.

He's endured a stolen script which was publicly reviewed, the screening
by the New York Post of a bootlegged copy of the film to select people for
"review," scathing commentary by people who never saw it, persistent
accusations of anti-Semitism and, beneath it all, boiling contempt for
Catholicism and believers.

Despite this, Gibson's screenings of the film have drawn almost
unanimous praise. But, personally, he's drawn fire and his defenders have
been trashed. The latest is the pope!

Frank Rich, did it in the New York Times. Obviously his nose is out of
joint because (in his words) he is "one of the many curious Jews who have
not been invited to press screenings of "The Passion."

Hey Frank, I'm one of the many curious Catholics who hasn't been
invited either. And I'm in the media and a conservative, too. So baby,
you're not alone. Buy a ticket!

Not having seen it doesn't stop Rich from ripping the film. He admits
he depends on hearsay and second-hand opinions. But when it was reported
that Pope John Paul II had a screening of the film and said "It is as it
was," Frank went berserk.

He tore into Daily Variety for describing John Paul as "a playwright
and movie buff," commenting lest anyone doubt his credentials.

Hey Frank, the pope is a playwright and also acted and directed
in his youth and always loved movies.

As for the pope's assessment of the integrity of the film, in case
Frank didn't notice, the pope is an expert in theology, the Bible
and the life and death of Christ. Somehow, I'll take his comments more
seriously than those of a newspaper writer, scared to death that a film,
filled with traditional religion, might be successful.

Not content to revile the pope, Frank Rich jumped on the bandwagon of
asserting the film encourages anti-Semitism, involves political
partisanship and, that it panders "to church-going Americans."

Hey Frank, what happened to target audiences?

Going further, he excoriated columnist Robert Novak (who saw the film
and said, it was not anti-Semitic) not for his "review," but for his
coverage of the presidential campaign (!) calling it "spiritual
McCarthyism"!

Now who's playing politics?

When Gibson – whose father was skewered in a major piece in the New
York Times Magazine – defended his film, Rich dismissed Gibson as playing
"hard-knuckle religious politics."

The arrogance of professional moralists who persist in attacking
traditional Christianity is breathtaking.

Hollywood and the media have no use for people with consistent beliefs.
They certainly have no use for people with religion, especially, if
that religion is Roman Catholic. Gibson's double sin is not only that he's
Roman Catholic, he's traditional Catholic – Latin Mass, against abortion –
one who prefers the Church before Vatican II opened the doors to modernism
and in the process lost much of what made Catholicism what it's been for
2,000 years.

God help the person who stands up for what he believes and who puts his
money where his mouth is.

God, indeed.

Barbara Simpson, "The Babe in
the Bunker" as she's known to her KSFO
560 radio talk-show audience in San Francisco, has a 20-year radio,
television and newspaper career in the Bay Area and Los
Angeles.

E-mail to a
Friend

Printer-friendly
version

NEWS:

Students hosting 'porn'
production

Age 13 collegian opening way for
vouchers?

Catholics confront Kerry on
abortion

Veterans, Vietnamese unite to oppose
Kerry

ABC News admits media leans
left

Farah hosts Stossel on radio
today

Wireless routers open door for
crooks

Man fined $10,000 after going to
church

Boycott of MTV advertisers
pushed

Britney Spears responds to altar
call

COMMENTARY:

What's wrong with 'gay'
marriage?
By Joseph Farah

New York City hates gun
owners
By Michelle Malkin

A matter of trust
By Pat
Buchanan

E-MAIL BARBARA
SIMPSON | GO TO
BARBARA SIMPSON'S ARCHIVE

GO TO PAGE 1 | GO TO PAGE 2 | GO TO COMMENTARY

SEARCH WND |
CONTACT WND

© 2004
WorldNetDaily.com, Inc.

Contact WND
Co-Located at Fiber Internet
Center